STRONG, THEREFORE SENSITIVE: MISGIVINGS ABOUT DEROSE’S CONTEXTUALISM
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Flexible Contextualism about Deontic Modals: A Puzzle about Information-Sensitivity
According to a recent challenge to Kratzer’s canonical contextualist semantics for deontic modal expressions, no contextualist view can make sense of cases in which such a modal must be information-sensitive in some way. Here I show howKratzer’s semantics is compatible with readings of the targeted sentences that fit with the data. I then outline a general account of how contexts select paramet...
متن کاملContextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism, and Knowledge of Knowledge
§I schematises the evidence for an understanding of ‘know’ and other terms of epistemic appraisal that embodies contextualism or subject-sensitive invariantism, and distinguishes between those two approaches. §II argues that although the cases for contextualism and sensitive invariantism rely on a principle of charity in the interpretation of epistemic claims, neither approach satisfies charity...
متن کاملMetaethical Contextualism
An important function of language is to create and develop interpersonal relationships in communication. In inquiry we share and coordinate our beliefs about how the world is. But we also take a stance and socially orient ourselves toward possible acts, attitudes, and states of affairs. We evaluate possibilities as desirable, appropriate, horrible, trivial, permissible, wonderful. We make deman...
متن کاملNonindexical contextualism
Philosophers on all sides of the contextualism debates have had an overly narrow conception of what semantic context sensitivity could be. They have conflated context sensitivity (dependence of truth or extension on features of context) with indexicality (dependence of content on features of context). As a result of this conflation, proponents of contextualism have taken arguments that establis...
متن کاملRadical Contextualism
Philosophers inspired by Wittgenstein have been waging a guerrilla war against compositional, truth-conditional semantics (CTCS) since the rise to dominance of that approach to the study of meaning in the early 1970s. The neo-Wittgensteinian resistance involves two elements: first, a focus on the way our assessment of the truth conditions of sentences changes in various, seemingly open-ended wa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Grazer Philosophische Studien
سال: 2012
ISSN: 0165-9227,1875-6735
DOI: 10.1163/9789401208338_011